/
Hinge and link comparison
Hinge and link comparison
How do hinges and links compare, and when is one recommended over the other?
Answer: Both hinges and links may be used to model localized nonlinear behavior. Depending on modeling goals, either one may be most appropriate. A summary of the primary advantages and comparisons are as follows:
Hinges
- Hinges are suitable for pushover analysis since hinge state may be displayed graphically for each pushover increment.
- Hinge properties may be entered manually, or automatically, according to FEMA or Caltrans guidelines.
- Multiple hinges may be assigned along element length to simulate the distribution of plasticity along the member.
Links
- More modeling features are available for links, including energy-dissipation capability, a variety of hysteresis models, and such advanced seismic properties as isolation and Wen plasticity.
- Hysteretic behavior may be specified for multiple DOF within a single link, which is not the case for hinges.
- Links are independent objects which do not require association with a frame element.
- Various link properties are available for modeling steel, concrete, and several types of bearing behavior.
See Also
- Additional comparisons between hinges and hysteretic links may be found in the Hinge FAQ article.
- Panel zone article
Related content
Hinge first steps (CSiBridge)
Hinge first steps (CSiBridge)
More like this
Caltrans vs. fiber hinge
Caltrans vs. fiber hinge
More like this
Hinge first steps (SAP2000)
Hinge first steps (SAP2000)
More like this
Link FAQ
Link FAQ
More like this
Hinge
More like this
Link
More like this