Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 17 Next »

How do hinges and links compare, and when is one recommended over the other?

Answer: Both hinges and links may be used to model localized nonlinear behavior. Depending on modeling goals, either one may be most appropriate. A summary of the primary advantages and comparisons are as follows:

Hinges:

  • Hinges are suitable for pushover analysis since hinge state may be displayed graphically for each pushover increment.
  • Hinge properties may be entered manually, or automatically, according to FEMA or Caltrans guidelines.
  • Multiple hinges may be assigned along element length to simulate the distribution of plasticity along the member.
  • Hinges may be used to model strength loss, while link response should increase monotonically.

Links:

  • More modeling features are available for links, including energy-dissipation capability, a variety of hysteresis models, and such advanced seismic properties as isolation and Wen plasticity.
  • Hysteretic behavior may be specified for multiple DOF within a single link, which is not the case for hinges.
  • Links are independent objects which do not require association with a frame element.
  • Various link properties are available for modeling steel, concrete, and several types of bearing behavior.

Additional comparisons between hinges and hysteretic links may be found in the Hinge FAQ article.

See Also

  • No labels