Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Why do I get negative stiffness during P-Delta analysis?

Extended Question: When I get negative stiffness and P-Delta analysis does not converge, does this indicate instability and buckling?

ANSWER: Convergence problems may correlate with P-Delta behavior. Inadequate member capacity and insufficient structural support may lead to instability and buckling. Excessivley large stiffness values may also disrupt convergence by causing numerical problems which adversely affect computation.

When a model fails under P-Delta, increase the size and/or quantity of columns and bracing to improve lateral capacity, and thereby avoid buckling. The Analysis Run Log will indicate which members have experienced instability. As an alternative, you may also refine the factors and/or loads applied during analysis.

It may be best to troubleshoot the model without P-Delta until you are confident that behavior is appropriate. If problems persist with geometric nonlinearity, it may be helpful to run, after the P-Delta load case, a modal analysis which uses Stiffness At The End Of This Stage. Modal analysis may then reveal the source and location of instability.

Unknown macro: {hidden-content}

Related Incident:

  • Unknown macro: {incident}
  • No labels