...
The substructure seismic-design process in the bridge modeler is documented in the Bridge Seismic Design manual. This manual, based on AASHTO specifications for LRFD bridge seismic design, describes the automated seismic-design procedure for bridges. Displacement-demand formulation is based on Article 4.8 of the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD bridge seismic design.
On this page:
| Table of Contents |
|---|
Applicability
Design procedures implemented in the bridge modeler are applicable to reinforced-concrete columns.
| Show if | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Related Incidents:
|
Seismic design category
The seismic design category, determined through AASHTO Article 3.5, is based on the design spectral acceleration of a one-second period.
...
For bridge models with integral substructure, users should reconsider pushover analysis for individual bents since the integral connection between bents and superstructure will cause frame action. Users may choose to investigate pushover response for the entire bridge (including deck) along the longitudinal axis. This may be done outside the bridge modeler.
| Show if | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Related Incidents:
|
Pushover target displacement ratio
...
During implementation, a pushover target displacement ratio equal to 1 pushes the structure to demand displacement. Setting this parameter equal to 2 pushes the structure to twice the demand displacement. Since pushover-curve drop indicates bent failure, users should review pushover curves to determine whether or not the structure achieves failure, and increase the target displacement ratio as necessary.
| Show if | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Related Incidents:
|
See Also
- Bridge Seismic Design manual
- Caltrans hinge article
| Show if | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Related Incidents:
|