Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Why

...

do

...

I

...

get

...

negative

...

stiffness

...

during

...

P-Delta

...

analysis?

...

Extended

...

Question:

...

When

...

I

...

get

...

negative

...

stiffness(i.e Diagonal<0),

...

and

...

P-Delta

...

analysis

...

does

...

not

...

converge,

...

does

...

this

...

indicate

...

instability

...

and

...

buckling?

...

Answer:

...

Convergence

...

problems

...

may

...

correlate

...

with

...

P-Delta

...

behavior.

...

Inadequate

...

member

...

capacity

...

and

...

insufficient

...

structural

...

support

...

may

...

lead

...

to

...

instability

...

and

...

buckling

...

. Excessively large stiffness values may also disrupt convergence by causing numerical problems which adversely affect computation.

When a model fails under P-Delta,

...

increase

...

the

...

size

...

and/or

...

quantity

...

of

...

columns

...

and

...

bracing

...

to

...

improve

...

lateral

...

capacity,

...

and

...

thereby

...

avoid

...

buckling.

...

Walls that have been modeled using membrane type area element (never recommended) or shells with unrealistic thickness and or low stiffness modifiers can buckle and cause convergence issues.  As an alternative, you may also refine the factors and/or loads applied during analysis.

It may be best to troubleshoot the model without P-Delta until you are confident that behavior is appropriate. If problems persist with geometric non-linearity, it may be helpful to run, after the P-Delta load case, a modal analysis which uses Stiffness At The End Of This Stage. Modal analysis may then reveal the source and location of instability.

Buckling can also occur in horizontal floor elements  such as beams and floors, if the floors take in plane loads (i.e have no diaphragm or semi rigid diaphragm) and have insufficient capacity, due to structural properties or small stiffness  modifiers. Using  rigid diaphragms and checking if the analysis converges can help rule out this as the cause of the problem.

Show if
groupeditors

Related Incidents:

  • Incident 47300: SAP help

Additional suggestions which may resolve negative-stiffness errors include:

  • Remove auto line constraints. Select all deck/shell objects in the model, then select Assign > Shell > Auto Edge Constraint , check the Do NOT create Edge Constraints, and uncheck the Apply to Full Structure (not just Selection) option. This will remove auto line constraints and possibly resolve instabilities.
Show if
groupeditors

Related Incidents:

  • Incident 47859: P-Delta issues