Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

On this page:

Table of Contents

Converting Bridge Object to Unlinked Model

...

Unlinking a parametric model

The bridge model should be developed using one of the parametric definitions of the Bridge menu. Users may then make manual changes using the Bridge > Update Linked Bridge Model " menu command to "> Convert to Unlinked Model " and make additional changes manually. By doing so, you are however loosing the advantage of parametric definition for modifying the model and for reviewing the results. Therefore, it is recommended to use this approach only when the model is fully finalized. In addition, it is also recommended to create a copy of option. This should only be done to finalize the bridge model, however, in that users will no longer have the advantages of parametric definition. Further, users may want to copy the file before converting to unlinked model, such that you can always go back if changes to the parametric bridge definition are needed.

Verifying Results of Moving Load Analysis by Static Load Case

Results of an unlinked model. Users will then have the option to revert to a previous version in case parametric changes are necessary. Please ensure that design done using the bridge modeler is not overwritten during linked model update.

Verify moving-load analysis using a static load case

A moving-load analysis envelopes the internal forces resulting from a series of possible truck locations.

Users may verify step-by-step and influence-based moving load analyses my be verified by running -load analysis results through a simple static load case with the static loads representing the truck placed to the location causing maximum effect for a desired response quantity.

Although the values will be different, as the result of a moving load analysis is envelope of internal forces for multiple truck locations, while the static load will produce internal forces only for one truck location (depending on where you apply the static load representing the truck), this analysis may serve as a simple check. The static load case should always produce results smaller or equal to the the moving load analysis.

For illustration purposes, let's say you are checking midspan moment on a simply supported beam due to a unit moving load. The midspan moment obtained from moving load analysis will match the midpan moment from the static load case only if the unit static load is placed at the midspan. But for real structures, the truck location causing the extreme forces may not be that obvious.

Moving Load Envelope for Nonlinear Model

You can obtain moving load envelope for nonlinear model by applying BRIDGE LIVE load pattern in a NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY load case (analysis case in V11). The key steps for setting up such model include the following:

  • Define load pattern (load case in V11) of type BRIDGE LIVE. Use small vehicle speed if you wish to disregard the dynamic effects.
  • This will automatically create a Multi-step static load case (analysis case in v11). Change this to a Time-History load case and set analysis type to nonlinear, direct-integration. Set the damping and other parameters as necessary.
  • When plotting the results, choose Envelope option.

Multiple Vehicles Acting Simultaneously in a Single Lane

Multiple vehicles acting simultaneously on one lane can be modeled in SAP2000 by specifying a special vehicle on the General Vehicle Data Form. This special vehicle would be defined such that it contains the . Static loads simulating truck positioning should induce maximum response for the parameter being observed. Static response should be equal to or slightly less than the moving-load results.

Multiple vehicles in a single lane

Users may model multiple vehicles acting simultaneously on a single lane by specifying a Special Vehicle on the General Vehicle Data form. This vehicle should be defined to include two vehicles separated by a fixed or variable distance between them. For example, definition of two HL93 trucks would consist of six axles: axles 1 to 3 would represent the first vehicle and axles 4 to 6 would represent the second vehiclecontain six axles, three for each vehicle.

Pinned condition for both abutment and bearings

...

Local instability will arise when both the abutment bearing and the abutment foundation spring

...

are defined as pinned.

...

To provide for rotational stiffness at the abutment, one of these two links should be fully fixed.

Mixed

...

For typical bridges, the entire bridge model can be developed within the bride modeler, i.e. using menu commands available in the Bridge menu. When you however need to model aspects not available in the current version of the bridge modeler (such as the superimposed loads or parapet loads), these need to be modeled "outside" of the bridge modeler, using other menu commands. In this case, you would be developing what we call a "mixed model" in which the bridge object created by the bridge modeler co-exists with regular modeling.

Miscellaneous Tips

...

model introduction

A mixed model is a bridge system designed using both the bridge modeler and the conventional software interface. Mixed modeling may be necessary for irregular, specialty, or highly customized systems. The typical procedure entails building the model core using parametric features of the bridge modeler, then unlinking the model to incorporate elements for which templates are not provided.

Please see the mixed modeling article for more information.