Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0
Wiki Markup
{live-template:Test Problem}

{action-request}
* The model should be revised to use the same maximum submesh size as is the discretization for the deck to avoid disconnected points.
* Revise the model to the latest version of SAP2000.
* Provide a discussion for interpreting the deck deflections due to weight of wet concrete.
{action-request}

\\

{on-this-page}


h1. Model screenshot

\\

!Staged_construction_for_precast_girder_bridge.png|align=center,border=0!

{center-text}Figure 1 - Deflected configuration{center-text}


h1. Approach 1, using section modifiers (Model B)

Approach 1 is described as follows:


h2. Key modeling steps

* Use the BrIM template to create a 2-span precast-girder bridge. Designate double bearings at the interior pier.

* Manually define 15 continuity [links|kb:Link] at the interior pier to connect the girders and deck between span 1 and span 2.

* Create three groups for the construction stage analysis of continuity links, deck, and all other objects.

* Use the Define > Named Property Sets > Area Modifiers command to define property modifiers for the deck [shell|kb:Shell] elements. This will simulate the hardening of concrete.

* Set up construction stage analysis with separate stages to:
\\
\\
*# Add and load girders;
\\
\\
*# Add deck shell elements;
\\
\\
*# Reduce the stiffness of deck shell elements to simulate concrete placement;
\\
\\
*# Apply the deck dead load;
\\
\\
*# Reset the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate the hardening of concrete; and
\\
\\
*# Add continuity links to the model.

* Save the results at the end of each stage.

* Define [moving-load|kb:Moving-load analysis] analysis, starting from the end of [staged-construction|kb:Staged construction] analysis.


h2. Modeling comments

* The bridge has fixed bearings at the bent which restrain vertical, longitudinal, and transverse translation. Sliding bearings at the abutments restrain vertical and transverse translation. For all other bearing DOF, *it is necessary to add small stiffness* to stabilize the girder before the deck is erected, otherwise stability problems may occur.


h2. Results

* Check bridge forces and stresses for each step of the staged construction analysis to ensure that moments are as expected for a simply-supported condition.

* Check moments for the results of moving-load analysis to ensure that moments are as expected for a continuous-girder system.


h2. Additional screen shots

The moment diagram upon completion of staged construction, after all loads are applied to simply-supported beams elements, is shown in Figure 2:

\\

!Moment_at_the_end_of_staged_construction_(simply_supported).png|align=center,border=0!

{center-text}Figure 2 - Moment diagram at the end of staged construction{center-text}

\\

Moment induced by live load, applied to a continuous span, is shown in Figure 3:

\\

!Moment_for_live_load_(continuous).png|align=center,border=0!

{center-text}Figure 3 - Live load moment diagram{center-text}

\\

{hidden-content}
*Important Comments:*

As of V14.1.0., *forces for each stage are reported to the centroid of the full bridge deck section.* You may need to transform the forces to the centroid of the section that is active when the forces are applied. See [bridge modeler forces and stresses diagrams|kb:Locations for reporting bridge superstructure and girder forces DRAFT] for additional information.
{hidden-content}


h1. Approach 2, changing section properties (Model C)

Approach 2 is described as follows:


h2. Key modeling steps

* Use the Quick Bridge template to create a 2-span precast-girder bridge with double bearings at the interior pier.

* Manually define 15 continuity [links|kb:Link] at the interior pier to connect the girders and deck between span 1 and span 2.

* Create three groups for the construction stage analysis of continuity links, deck, and all other objects.

* Set up construction stage analysis with separate stages to:
\\
\\
*# Add and load the girders;
\\
\\
*# Add deck shell elements;
\\
\\
*# Reduce the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate concrete placement;
\\
\\
*# Apply the deck dead load;
\\
\\
*# Reset the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate the hardening of concrete; and
\\
\\
*# Add continuity links to the model.


h1. Attachments

* [SAP2000 V12.0.2 file |Staged-construction analysis of two-span precast-girder bridge^SAP2000 V12.0.2 model B.zip] of Model B (zipped SDB file)

{hidden-content}
*TO DO:* Show powerpoint presentation with screenshots for model B.
{hidden-content}


Model screenshot


Image Added

Approach 1, using section modifiers (Model B)

Approach 1 is described as follows:

Key modeling steps

  • Use the BrIM template to create a 2-span precast-girder bridge. Designate double bearings at the interior pier.
  • Manually define 15 continuity links at the interior pier to connect the girders and deck between span 1 and span 2.
  • Create three groups for the construction stage analysis of continuity links, deck, and all other objects.
  • Use the Define > Named Property Sets > Area Modifiers command to define property modifiers for the deck shell elements. This will simulate the hardening of concrete.
  • Set up construction stage analysis with separate stages to:

    1. Add and load girders;

    2. Add deck shell elements;

    3. Reduce the stiffness of deck shell elements to simulate concrete placement;

    4. Apply the deck dead load;

    5. Reset the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate the hardening of concrete; and

    6. Add continuity links to the model.
  • Save the results at the end of each stage.

Modeling comments

  • The bridge has fixed bearings at the bent which restrain vertical, longitudinal, and transverse translation. Sliding bearings at the abutments restrain vertical and transverse translation. For all other bearing DOF, it is necessary to add small stiffness to stabilize the girder before the deck is erected, otherwise stability problems may occur.

Results

  • Check bridge forces and stresses for each step of the staged construction analysis to ensure that moments are as expected for a simply-supported condition.
  • Check moments for the results of moving-load analysis to ensure that moments are as expected for a continuous-girder system.

Additional screen shots

The moment diagram upon completion of staged construction, after all loads are applied to simply-supported beams elements, is shown in Figure 2:


Image Added


Moment induced by live load, applied to a continuous span, is shown in Figure 3:


Image Added


Approach 2, changing section properties (Model C)

Approach 2 is described as follows:

Key modeling steps

  • Use the Quick Bridge template to create a 2-span precast-girder bridge with double bearings at the interior pier.
  • Manually define 15 continuity links at the interior pier to connect the girders and deck between span 1 and span 2.
  • Create three groups for the construction stage analysis of continuity links, deck, and all other objects.
  • Set up construction stage analysis with separate stages to:

    1. Add and load the girders;

    2. Add deck shell elements;

    3. Reduce the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate concrete placement;

    4. Apply the deck dead load;

    5. Reset the stiffness of the deck shell elements to simulate the hardening of concrete; and

    6. Add continuity links to the model.

Attachments